Published as a new operational checklist with explicit human-decision and connection boundaries.
Why this matters
A new-business file can look complete after the proposal has been sent even when its earlier reasoning is impossible to reconstruct. A changed answer might overwrite the original fact-find. A comparison table might lose the insurer quote documents that support it. An email may show the client’s priority but sit outside the case. ASIC’s general licensee obligations and NIBA’s professional standards reinforce the need for effective, honest and reviewable processes, while the exact controls remain a matter for the responsible brokerage. Capturing evidence as work progresses reduces the temptation to rebuild the file retrospectively after the commercial work is finished.
Key points to carry into the work
- Treat the fact-find as a versioned evidence set, not a single form that is overwritten until it looks complete.
- Make the broker’s market selection, judgement and approval separate from automated extraction or draft preparation.
- Keep each quoted term connected to the market response, document, email or approved capture method that supplied it.
- Do not close the case until delivery, client instruction and any placement or decline outcome are recorded through the authorised process.
- 01Scope the enquiry
- 02Build the fact-find
- 03Resolve gaps
- 04Prepare the market
- 05Approve the comparison
- 06Record the outcome
New-business evidence from enquiry to outcome
Where Insia fits
Insia’s intended new-business workflow links Broker CRM, Quote Desk and Compliance Case Manager. CRM coordinates the enquiry, conversations and ownership. Quote Desk, currently a private pilot, organises the fact-find, evidence gaps, market preparation and comparable quote information for broker review. Compliance Case Manager, in private validation, can assemble the related evidence and prepare a Draft Readiness Preview. People remain responsible for market selection, advice, approval and external action.
Keep the boundary clear. Insia does not guarantee that this checklist covers a brokerage’s legal or licence requirements. It does not recommend an insurer, select a market, provide advice, submit a quote, bind cover or certify the case. Connection methods are enabled only for an agreed workflow and must have a controlled manual fallback. The brokerage must apply its own disclosures, authorisations, approvals and retention requirements.
Checklist
- Enquiry, scope and owner recorded
- Fact-find versions and supporting sources retained
- Gaps and client clarifications resolved or visible
- Market strategy and quote sources recorded
- Broker rationale and required approval complete
- Client delivery and final outcome preserved
Sources and scope
Sources support the external context in this guide. Current product capability and availability are explained on the linked Insia product page.
- ASIC: AFS licensee obligationsAustralian Securities and Investments Commission · Accessed 10 August 2026
- NIBA: Insurance Brokers Code of PracticeNational Insurance Brokers Association · Accessed 10 August 2026
- OAIC: APP 11 security of personal informationOffice of the Australian Information Commissioner · Accessed 10 August 2026
Common questions
Should a new-business file include unsuccessful market responses?
Where they are relevant to the brokerage’s market process or decision, preserve the response and its source rather than only the preferred quote. The brokerage’s procedure determines the required scope and retention.
Can AI complete a fact-find for the broker?
AI can extract candidate facts, organise documents and surface possible gaps. A person must verify the source, resolve ambiguity with the client and decide whether the information is sufficient for the work.
When is the new-business evidence file finished?
Use the brokerage’s definition of completion. Operationally, the file should at least show the approved client output, delivery record, client instruction and final placement, decline or closure state, with open follow-up clearly assigned.
Put the context to work
Turn this evidence task into a visible case.
Discuss how the evidence, requirements and human decisions in this guide could become a reviewable Compliance Case Manager workflow. This starts a product conversation and does not guarantee pilot access.
Discuss Compliance Case Manager