Published as a new renewal-specific evidence checklist with version and reconfirmation controls.
Why this matters
Renewal work is vulnerable to silent assumptions. A prior schedule may be treated as current; an exposure change may be buried in a service email; an alternative quote may be compared against the renewal on inconsistent assumptions. NIBA describes broker support across the life of the policy, and ASIC’s licensee guidance emphasises competent, fair and adequately resourced processes. A versioned renewal file helps the team see whether the current work is based on current evidence. It also creates a cleaner handover when the servicing broker, account manager, approver or compliance reviewer changes during the cycle.
Key points to carry into the work
- Anchor the case to the expiring policy version, prior client instruction and prior rationale rather than an unlabelled copy of last year’s data.
- Ask which facts and exposures changed; do not present carried-forward information as newly confirmed unless the client or an authorised source confirmed it.
- Compare renewal and alternative responses on a consistent basis, with assumptions, conditions and missing items visible.
- Record the client’s final instruction and the authorised outcome, including any follow-up created by late documents or conditional terms.
- 01Anchor the prior policy
- 02Collect renewal terms
- 03Confirm changes
- 04Prepare market work
- 05Approve the decision
- 06Record the outcome
Renewal evidence from prior record to new term
Where Insia fits
Quote Desk is designed to begin a renewal case with the prior policy, renewal material and changed facts, then surface gaps and prepare renewal and alternative responses for broker review. Compliance Case Manager can organise the source and decision trail into a Draft Readiness Preview. Broker CRM keeps renewal ownership, client conversations and follow-up visible. Quote Desk is a private pilot and Compliance Case Manager is in private validation; neither replaces the brokerage’s licensed decision and approval process.
Keep the boundary clear. Insia does not decide whether a renewal is suitable, recommend cover, choose an insurer, provide advice, place or renew a policy, certify compliance or confirm that a client’s circumstances are unchanged. The brokerage must define its renewal process, evidence requirements, market approach, approval gates and record-retention rules. Any connection is scoped and monitored rather than assumed to work across every market.
Checklist
- Expiring policy and prior decision identified
- Renewal documents and versions preserved
- Changed and carried-forward facts labelled
- Market strategy and response sources visible
- Comparison, rationale and approval recorded
- Client instruction and final policy outcome linked
Sources and scope
Sources support the external context in this guide. Current product capability and availability are explained on the linked Insia product page.
- ASIC: AFS licensee obligationsAustralian Securities and Investments Commission · Accessed 10 August 2026
- NIBA: Insurance Brokers Code of PracticeNational Insurance Brokers Association · Accessed 10 August 2026
- OAIC: APP 11 security of personal informationOffice of the Australian Information Commissioner · Accessed 10 August 2026
Common questions
Can last year’s fact-find simply be copied into the renewal?
It can provide a starting point, but copied information should be labelled as prior information until the brokerage’s process reconfirms or updates it. The file should show what the client was asked and how each material change was handled.
Should the renewal evidence include alternatives that were not selected?
Where alternatives formed part of the market work or rationale, retain enough source and comparison evidence to explain their role. Follow the brokerage’s authorised process and retention policy.
What if the final policy documents arrive after renewal?
Keep the case open or create a controlled follow-up until the issued documents are checked against the approved instruction. Record discrepancies and route them to the responsible person rather than silently closing the evidence file.
Put the context to work
Turn this evidence task into a visible case.
Discuss how the evidence, requirements and human decisions in this guide could become a reviewable Compliance Case Manager workflow. This starts a product conversation and does not guarantee pilot access.
Discuss Compliance Case Manager